Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smallcase (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 17:18, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Smallcase

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There was a relatively recent AfD in which several socks participated and have been blocked - see WP:Articles for deletion/Smallcase. Notwithstanding the concerns over COI editing in general, the topic fails our notability criteria. None of the references discussed at the previous AfD meet WP:NCORP and none have been provided or found since. HighKing⁺⁺ 14:25, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Companies. HighKing⁺⁺ 14:25, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. HighKing⁺⁺ 14:30, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Mint appears to be non-reliable, TechCrunch can only be used to verify they exist, as it's a non-reliable source. Rest appear to be blogs or advertorials. Oaktree b (talk) 15:23, 16 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: as per nom. I tried to rewrite this entity's page into survival state (duly assisted by Timtrent). But, not confident with the outcome. As one of the alternatives to deletion, merging it with Zerodha could be explored as per WP:ATD-M. Again... it depends on the general consensus derived from this discussion. - Hatchens (talk) 16:36, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can you point to something that confirms this company is owned by Zerodha? HighKing⁺⁺ 19:57, 17 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@HighKing there are few cues pointing towards it - 1, and 2. But, here's the catch... there is always a difference between "getting an investment" and "being backed". So, the confirmation is based on one's interpretation. Since, it's a company AfD discussion and you're an expert in this domain... I'll stick to your "final call". - Hatchens (talk) 03:13, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, that's not the same thing at all. Getting an investment is pretty much the same as "being backed" and neither mean that the investors/backers are the owners. HighKing⁺⁺ 11:01, 18 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@HighKing, then it's a delete. Period! - Hatchens (talk) 08:35, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Despite Hatchens's valiant attempt to edit this to show it passes WP:NCORP, and despite my own WP:BEFORE I find it fails NCORP. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 15:34, 19 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails GNG and also the subjective criteria. Nothing worth discussion. ─ The Aafī on Mobile ^{^(talk)} 19:26, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Brochure article. scope_creep^Talk 12:34, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per my vote at the previous AFD discussion. M4DU7 (talk) 16:35, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:NCORP, as I cannot find enough independent coverage that makes this significant. Mario Jump 83! 08:36, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.